Matt Borghi

Songs, soundscapes, and improvisations for deep listening.

New Longform Soundscape – Close of Day – Longform Rework

New longform – Close of Day – Longform Rework
New releases are always $0/name your price on Bandcamp until the next one comes out.

This was originally released in 2022 as a shorter track on Valley View Record’s Sleep Cycle II compilation, but was removed when our contract ended.

Recently, the unavailability of this track was brought to my attention and I thought that I would re-release it and rework it as a longform.

I haven’t listened to it in a while and I am finding it to be a very enjoyable track; I hope you enjoy it, too.

matt

 

 

Book Review – Dave Liebman’s The Art of Skill

 

I love Dave Liebman, his work, his philosophy, his artistry and his dedication to craft. As a devoted musical improviser, when I learned of his book, The Art of Skill – Establishing the Mindset For Unleashing the Music Inside You, I was super eager to get into Lieb’s brain and see what insights this master could offer. Instead, after thousands of purchases across more than two decades of using Amazon, I was moved to write my first product review.  Here tis:

I don’t think that I’ve ever written a review for anything in thousands of Amazon purchases, but I definitely feel obliged to issue a ‘buyer beware’ warning for this unfortunate collection of pages attributed to Dave Liebman, as author. I say attributed because there are references in the text stating that this was a project of a Michael Lake, who I can’t seem to find anything biographics or CV on – He is credited thusly, on the cover: “Edited and Designed by Michael Lake”. No other credentials are included. 

When I first heard about this book from Lieb, I went to Amazon and reluctantly swallowed the thirty bucks thinking that this might be a real chance to get an insight in Lieb’s perspectives; that was partially true. However, when I first received this in the mail I was taken aback by the paltry, print-on-demand collection of perfect bound pages that arrived. To call it a book, m’mmm… not quite, only if, say a pharmaceutical insert stuffed in The Times is considered a book or more aptly, a Scholastic Reader, which is what this 50ish pages of wide margins, poorly written and even more poorly proofread text alongside a mish-mash of motivational stock imagery with a few pics of Lieb and friends through the years thrown in for good measure seems to be. A book? That’s a tough proposition by any measure. 

I didn’t pick this up for about six months, but when I finally picked up this collection of pages, it was, well, not great. A series of shoddily edited interviews (maybe?). I know now that LIeb almost became an orthopedic surgeon and a lawyer, but that didn’t bear repeating four times in, sort of, tangential asides to other things Lieb was talking about. And that’s the thing here, there’s no editorial throughline and no narrative to speak of. I surely didn’t get any insight into ‘the art of skill’ or really an insight into anything except Lieb’s other potential career directions! Without a doubt, you’d get more, better articulated (and edited) insight if you were to just read the first ten articles in a Google search for “Dave Liebman”. Certainly, this collection was not, is not, worth thirty bucks. And that’s the thing that’s outrageous here: Dave Liebman is known for quality and lifelong dedication to craft; this poorly written, poorly edited, poorly assembled, poorly laid out, cheaply printed and extremely overpriced collection is far beneath Dave Liebman. If anybody ever reads this, I’d say a fair price point for this is about $10 and with the printing costs you should still be making $9.

If it were some rando jazz guy, I’d give ’em a pass, but with lieb, man, I just can’t do that. He’s a teacher, master, musician and founder of the International Association of Schools of Jazz. Was there really nobody in his orbit that he could have shared this with to get an opinion on the writing, the editing, the layout, the presentation, etc. As someone who worked in publishing, I’d wager that a second set of eyes were never laid on this collection. Perhaps, the price tag can be attributed to the astronomical price of college textbooks and somebody was hoping to get this on some syllabi? I really don’t know, but this is an unfortunate and overpriced collection of pages that’s not worthy of having Dave Liebman’s name on it or associated with his amazing legacy of excellence. 

As disappointed as I am with this work, I’m being generous with the three star rating. I think there are some, just Ok, insights within these pages, but it never scratches the surface of the promise of the title:  The Art of Skill – Establishing the Mindset for Unleashing the Music Inside You, this collection of pages and random images, definitely ain’t that! 

Anyway, my work is done. I’m disappointed, but hopefully, other folks can avoid the same disappointment and maybe even the editors/authors will take another look at things in the second printing. Lieb’s an amazing and awe-inspiring artist, a true craftsman, don’t let this dissuade you from his work.

 

A story about musical vision

Recently, I had a band. My first band in years. A band I assembled mid-pandemic; no small feat. It lasted for about two months, mostly because I’m not a great band member and lack the ability to compromise where vision is concerned. Some, who are inspired by leadership books, might think this is admirable. Some others, who aren’t, might just think that I’m challenging (to put it nicely) to work with. I’ve been around long enough now to know who I am and I’m not above change, but when it comes to musical vision, I have a stubborn and uncompromising streak that’s very unZen and frequently has me getting in my own way. We live, we learn, we evolve. That’s the journey.

In an effort to communicate that musical vision, I drafted the story/note below. It’s not impertinent to my musical journey, so I thought I’d share it here:

Several years ago, when several of my longtime collaborators relocated, geographically or temporally, I started looking for other musical likeminds. My interests could be jazz, rock, jam bands, country, folk, what have you, but at the core was group improvisation. 

I stumbled upon this art quite by chance when I was sixteen. I was hit with a sudden moment of deep and profound awareness. I remember it very clearly: A dark and dingy basement. A gang of lackluster, wannabe, punk musicians trying to make art, trying to begin a journey of musical exploration by going in any direction, knowing only that the call was real and palpable, but otherwise clueless as to how to proceed. 

We were trash, mostly from broken homes. A couple us played in school band, but mostly we knew nothing about assembling a band, making music as a group or even making a go of such a thing. While we were trying to be punk, thinking that that was a skill level we could meet, we all loved and bonded over Pink Floyd. One night we decided to try and do “a Pink Floyd kind of song” – Whatever the hell that meant. We had no real effects, just a bass, drums, two guitar situation, so we got to it. It started with some cymbal washes and I played a droney bass guitar line. The guitar players tried a two guitar harmony thing. Neither of them knew their scales so after a series of wrong notes that didn’t help the vibe, they telepathically and mutually agreed to stick with the couple notes that they had learned through real-time trial and error and were in key. We jammed on this vibe for about forty minutes – We were stone cold sober as a deep harmony and resonance took us over. What we lacked in technique we made up for telepathically, each player knowing where the other player was going to go; playing, blending, truly in concert until we were musically one. Our connection to the music, the moment and each other was deep and palpable. After the jam, nobody spoke, nobody made eye contact, we just looked at the ground in awe. Silent. A couple of us lit up cigarettes and just let the vibe sink in. Finally, somebody made a joke to ease the awkwardness of such a vulnerable experience. We laughed, but shit had changed; we had just taken a ride on some celestial plane. 

For me, music would never be the same; it became a readily-accessible, substance-free, vehicle for transcendence and for thirty years, my life since that point, I’ve been driven by the pursuit of solo and group musical improvisation.  

The Road Less Travelled

As was started over a year ago with the release of Consciousness of Light and I continued to work on through the early pandemic lockdown, it’s all about the songs and songwriting. I’ve released a few things in that time, a new series called Dronearium (1 and 2 are out now) of mostly long-from atmospheric soundscapes – I have about ten of these that are mostly finished that I’ve worked on over the last year, as well as releasing a recording that Michael Teager and I had worked on for quite some time, Subterranean Bearings.

Through it all, through all of this crazy 2020, the songs have been a touchstone. I constantly come back to the songs. I’ve tried to create a follow-up to Ambient Guitar not less than 40 times and I have dozens of guitar-centric ambient tracks. The smart money is on an Ambient Guitar follow-up, which folks have loved and has given me no shortage of good energy inspiration, but the inspiration continues to move to the songs – Back to basics.

I’m particularly proud of this May YouTube performance, where I brought together the songs with ambient guitar in a live performance setting:

I feel like this is the future, right now, but usually no sooner than I’ve said it, the muse takes me down some other creative rabbit hole.

For the better part of this year and last, I’ve been working on a recording I’ve been calling “Within/Without” but then I found another record with that name, so now I don’t know what I’m calling it. This record is song-centric. It could be summed as songs with ambient drones and textures, like Olagra, like Consciousness of Light, but, presently, there’s only one instrumental track.

It’s been with no shortage of self-consciousness, which is likely why it’s taken me 15 years and more start/stops that I can recall, to make the songs the focal point. I’ve loved my exploration of sound and textures and raw, unbridled creativity, but I’ve also felt, at times, emotionally absent from those recordings, perhaps its the lack of ego in that music and perhaps it’s a good thing. Perhaps the songs are the ego’s way of pulling me into myself rather than focusing on a music that’s beyond myself and not about me. That’s plausible, but I have to take the journey. No shortcuts.

So, yeah, that’s where things are. I’m writing songs. I’m singing songs. I’ve called it ambient folk, drone folk and dreamt up many more marketing categories to try and relay, in a few words, what I’m trying to achieve. It just doesn’t work that way.

I hope you’ll stay with me, but I understand that, as a friend once told me as a punchline to a joke: “I’m not interested in growing with you as an artist; just play the hits.”

Matt Borghi – Winter Eyes

I’ve started this record dozens of times and each time I stalled, each time it fell to the wayside and didn’t go any further. There have been so many start/stops that I assumed this record would never get made. An attempt at this record was created under my own name from 2006, called Olagra… Originally, Olagra was an idea created in quiet room, then it was a band and then a record that had some allusion to the original ideas and some fragments of the band; but those were little more than sketches. After that Olagra was little more than a haunting sentiment floating in the aether nagging me, constantly reminding me of what could have been, maybe what should have been, but certainly, categorically what wasn’t… until it was: Winter Eyes.

 

[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc4t7IQQakI[/embedyt]

Winter Eyes, is the definitive recording of songs that I was writing in 2004 and 2005, and beyond with all of the psych folk, AM 70s light rock and mellow gold that I could mine. It, simultaneously, contains allusions to all these things, while being none of those things. I can find no category to put it in. It just is. I’ve called it ‘psych folk’, but now I call it droneFolk. as good of a label as any I can find, as it’s primarily acoustic and folky, but it’s also rich, sonically, as I chose not to pursue mutually exclusive paths of acoustic conservatism or strict synthesized sonics; instead, I’ve opted to pursue both, equally, simultaneously.

[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpeix8QbwtA[/embedyt]

That period of the mid-aughts was special for me, because after a hiatus of more than ten years focusing on sound, rather than songs, I was quite compelled to go back to songwriting, which was where I started, as a wee pup, to begin with. Once I started getting going with the songs I found that they were too personal (too precious) to commodify and bring to life as a “project” or a published recording. I couldn’t separate myself from them enough to do that with the work. Even now, I struggle with this. I think that’s why  there were so many false starts. Eventually, I made peace with the “songs” as a creative path and through that catharsis realized that I was obligated to share this music out, as I had first envisioned it, but wasn’t quite able to capture, so many years before. I’ve done that now.

[embedyt] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgFcQg-jndg[/embedyt]

The intersection of creative process, creative intention and the flow of creative output

I’m sure that this will be a post that serves only to frame my creative thoughts and give catharsis to me while offering very little to the average site visitor. What I hope for is that anybody who’s in the throes of what do and where to go next with their art might stumble upon this and say ‘oh, I really should keep at this thing…’ This is especially for those souls struggling with where they hope to go with their art after so many, varied paths and experiments have provided little in the way of satisfying fruit.

Specifically, what I’m speaking of is my pursuit of the last fifteen or so years to merge three of my passions, musically, into one meaningful creative art form and outlet. It’s important to note here that I’m not talking about creating my own creative high water mark from an art as commodity perspective, like Miles Davis’ Bitches Brew, Fleetwood Mac’s Rumours or Pink Floyd’s The Dark Side of the Moon, but rather create a personal high water mark for my creative process, the place where creative intention and the flow creative output perfectly intersect. Until now, I’ve been confident that this was probably an impossible concept. Even now, I’m sure that like so many thing in the stream of life, it’s fleeting. It’s probably that, but that’s Ok. Such is the process.

The intersection of creative process, creative intention and the flow of creative output is really more about a feeling, a sentiment, a motivation, rather than about any kind of output. Here, I channel the eastern-influenced perspective on creativity rather than that of the west, where the process is the point, rather than the outcome. Some people will say: “Man, how are you so prolific…” And for me, it’s not about output, it’s about process, being in creative stream of the process all the time. From that process comes output. I try to be in that process at least once a day – It’s how I recharge and renew.

What creative endeavors have I been trying to merge for the better part of a decade and a half? Well, there are three pieces:

  1. Musical Improvisation
  2. My Singer/Songwriter work
  3. Ambient/Drone and Textural work

Ambient/Drone music and improvisation has always been a natural fit for me. The perfect intersection of sound, timbre, texture, chance and most importantly flow. That’s always been a natural fit. Trying to bring in my singer/songwriter perspective has been, altogether, a different kind of animal. From a perspective of releases, I began exploring this with the Kosik project. Then I began to explore it in the context of my ambient music through a series of one-offs. Then I began exploring it as Olagra. Olagra became the primary vehicle for this exploration, but that never felt satisfying or complete. First, there was the record I did under my own name, Olagra, from 2005, a potpourri of ambient guitar tracks, droney songs and out-takes from the live band incarnation of Olagra. In 2015, under the Olagra name, proper, I released Winter Eyes, which was a fun undertaking and I really grew as a producer and singer during the recording of that, but I went off into some kind of roots rock alt-folk thing and moved away from improvisation and ambient/drone, both… Actually, I thought, for a long time that Winter Eyes might have finally satisfied that urge to merge, as it were (can’t resist a bad pun), but I was wrong…

Even before Winter Eyes  and I have to thank my musical partner, Michael Teager, for his infinite patience here, I tried to bring the singer/songwriter stuff into the work of Borghi | Teager. In fact, Borghi | Teager, our ambient project was borne out of a series of shows under the Teag and PK moniker, in which we improvised on songs. Later, as Borghi | Teager we focused on ambient/drone and improvisation. The various perspectives had an air of exclusivity to them, for me. The ambient/drone could be improvised, but lacked the structure and the songs. The songs had structure and could be “ambient” or droney, but lacked improvisation; this piece also usually occurred in a recording situation. The songs could be improvised, wherein I would basically write songs in real time, start out with vamps, draft a melody, build on the melody, try to add texture… this phase couldn’t have been accomplished without my outboard pedal situation or my use of Ableton Live. Even still, my singing and musical instincts couldn’t respond adequately to the improvised moments. Damn. Back to the drawing board.

I’m a long-time fan of improvisation. I’ve been improvising musically almost as along as I’ve been writing songs. I love improvised music from jazz to jam bands to John Cage. To me the pinnacle of the art form is improvisation, so you could say I’ve become quite the student of improvisation. I believe, especially for live performances that, to bring oneself 100% completely to a live performance, mind, body and spirit, is to give a true, original, fresh and unique performance worthy of any audience that might be interested in seeing what you have to offer. What I didn’t realize, though, and this maybe the printer in me coming out, was what I had embarked on as part of my creative vision, was every bit as much about developing the craft of making the music and bringing together these elements to do it, just as a plumber, electrician, master carpenter, cobbler or printer must apprentice and learn their craft.

That sounds like a pretty significant epiphany the way I set it up.

It wasn’t. In fact, like so many things, I’m slow on the uptake and it took me a long time to internalize this realization. I’m still trying to self-actualize it; this writing is part of that.

For the artist, there’s no script, there’s no path. Art is a synthesis of an individual’s influences and interests. As Joseph Campbell said, ‘Your life has no precedent’ and this couldn’t be more true for the artist: ‘Your art has no precedent’… Sure, I could get into true art, and original art and all that, but I’m going to dispense with terms such as ‘true’ and ‘original’ and assume that anybody who endeavors to smear something on a wall or a page for its own sake and endeavors to do it more completely and better each time, is the kind of artist I’m talking about. So, if ‘your art has no precedent’ then it stands to reason that you have to define what the apprenticeship of developing your craft is based on what you’re trying to do as an artist. No shortcuts. You have to define it yourself.

For starters, you have to have a vision. Without the vision, even a foggy, vague vision it’s almost impossible to know where to go next. Once you have the vision, which, while I blow past it quickly, isn’t necessarily a given or easy to achieve. Anyway, once you have the vision you can begin work… For me, only after a very long time did I, sort of, unbeknownst to me, start developing my craft. I didn’t know I was developing a craft, it was just happening. This dawned on me recently as I went back and listened to Huronic Minor, my second full-length recording for 2000… Does it stand alone, sure, I guess, as much as anything does? But it’s mono, because I didn’t know how to record in stereo, and flat. I’m making myself feel defensive, which is funny because if I had a record that seems to be universally appreciated it’s Huronic Minor, but when I listen to it 18 years later, sonically, I’m not satisfied with it. I like the textural and musical material, but the recording is flat, but of course it is it was recorded in mono in $35 multitrack recording software that I scarcely knew how to use. In time, I learned how to use it. In time, I made great strides in my recordings. In time, I would be able to go into the biggest and grandest studios in the world and would give direction on mic placement, acoustics and a variety of things to capture my sonic vision, but it all started with that crappy $35 multitrack recording software that I bought at Best Buy. It probably even started before, more like 1996, when I landed a fluke music production job at a Detroit radio station because I was too disinterested in doing the promotion work that I was actually hired for. I would have been the guy handing out bumper stickers and keychains, but I wandered into an unused studio doubling as a production suite where an ex-On-Air talent guy was cutting commercials, and voila, I was creating music. I don’t remember it too clearly now, but I used some kind of weird integrated system, with a monitor, keyboard thing with other controls and a couple 3.5 floppy drives — Maybe an Otari DN-10, but I seem to recall it had a green screen that looked a lot like Fairlight synthesizer model. I combined an Everything But the Girl loop with an explosion on the 1 beat… Man, was I pleased with myself…

So, yeah, craft… I think I’ve written about this before, but I got into improvisation after reading a book about Pink Floyd who came up with their sound trying to emulate what they heard was happening in San Francisco in the mid-1960s, so I, in turn, decided that I wanted to take my high school band in a direction of more improvisation, so that we, in 1993, could be more like the Pink Floyd of 1968 that was emulating the Grateful Dead of 1967. Man, I free associated a lot to get that point. I didn’t musical improvisation was a thing. I didn’t even improvise much until I resolved to use it as a tool to stretch out our songs. There was no Internet then and I really kind of intuited my way through relying on little more than imagination and conceptual framework that I was developing from my 100,00th listening of Shine On You Crazy Diamond, Side A, because, of course, at the time I wanted to believe that was completely improvised… how else could there be all that space in between the words and music and texture. In hindsight, that was an uninformed perspective based on little more than making up a narrative, but that recording as a whole became a singular touchstone for much of the work that I would in the 25 years that would follow…. ‘Shine’ had those opening textures, a spaciousness, clean production, great, memorable lyrics. It evoked a sense of time, a sense of what it meant to be a live and it was unlike anything I had ever heard. The first time I heard it: Mind completely blown – Face completely melted. Straight up in blew me away.

I continued to develop improvisation. I continued to write songs. I continued to merge the two. Around 2000, in a story I’ve told too many times, when I purchased a 4-track recorder I learned how to make ambient/drone music. I did this for years. I released a lot of records, but after the first few years I wanted to bring improvisation, songs and the ambient/drones together. 15ish years later, I’ve finally done that.

It’s been an interesting journey… As I was writing this two particular incidents stuck out to me. The first was this was one time, probably 14 years ago, when I was talking to academic guy I had just met about improvisation. We were having a good discussion. He was pro composition. I was pro improvisation with composition baked into it. He told me that maybe I was just lazy. That pissed me off. We didn’t talk after that. In hindsight, maybe he was right. The second incident was more recent — A dude reviewed Shades of Bending Light, a 2015 improvised recording I did with Michael Teager. The guy said something to the effect of ‘it’s a great record, but there’s no way that they improvised this; it wouldn’t be that…’ Ahh, that was a favorite, because we literally started the tapes rolling without any preconceived notions and what came out was what we released. It was a compliment and also kind of not. Sure, it’s a recording, a commodity, not every minute of every track made it onto the release. We recorded for two and half hours and did zero post-production, I culled it down to about 65-70 minutes… Still, completely improvised.

I shared these anecdotes to illustrate how the path of an artist’s craft is a long and circuitous one. I may lose this feeling tomorrow, delete this post in a month and in ten years ask myself what the hell I was thinking when I wrote it, such is the path…

I feel like you have to respond to the moment. Those are the feelings of the moment, the sensations of the moment, the experiences of the moment, etc… I don’t always do it, but I always try. Improvisation is a place, where usually, about 90% of the time when I put my instrument on and the first note sounds, I’m there, man, all in… There’s nowhere else. There’s no time. There’s no tomorrow or yesterday, future or past, but the moment as it all unfolds… sometimes it’s great, sometimes it’s not, sometimes it’s just barely good enough to keep doing it, but I keep doing it. What else would I do?

I have a small, unpolished, arguably questionable release that I’m doing to celebrate this place, this long sought after intersection of the singer/songwriter, the improviser and the drone artist. All of this music is live. Recorded in one take. There was no prep. There were no notes. There were no lyrics written down (I’ve had to transcribe those after the fact). There was no pre-production. There was no post-production (other than EQing and compressing the final mixed tracks). Some will notice none of this. Some will notice all of this. Those that don’t like the mix of vocals and drones won’t like this. Those that don’t like vocals really won’t like this. Those who like only vocals won’t care for the drones. Those who are willing to have an open mind will likely bum on the, less than audiophile, sound quality. This is all live, a snapshot of the creative mind at work and all that comes with that; like life, sometimes it ain’t pretty, sometimes the pretty hides in the folds of the not so pretty and you have to get down all fours and really examine the thing, and then, maybe, you only see a flash of the sublime or maybe it was a speck of dust caught in sun’s ray. Anyway, enough. If you got this far. Thanks. Writing about music is like dancing about architecture, and still I try.

 

A Soliloquy About Vaporous Pianos and Ambient Music

I listen to music to open up. I listen to music to forget. I listen to music to explore the edges of my mind. I listen to music to be better. I like the way music makes me feel. I’m constantly thinking about new musical ideas and I see inspiration for new songs, sounds and compositions everywhere. Recently, I was riding in an elevator listening to the hum of the motor and as I toned with the vibration I started to sing a melody. Fortunately, nobody caught me as they would have been sure that I had lost my mind, singing loudly on the elevator on a particularly gray Monday morning. But there I was. I couldn’t help myself. Music and ideas for music are everywhere.

For reasons that still haven’t become totally clear to me I find my inspiration leads me towards ambient music. Sometimes these are drones, sometimes these are washed out guitars, or as my friend Jeff Towne called spacey piano textures: “vaporous piano”. There’s something really appealing about the nuance of ambient music. It doesn’t put it all out there, it holds something back for you to experience, an essence of sorts that you just can’t grab onto, such as you can the melody of Mozart’s Eine Kleine Nacht Musik or the Beatles Yesterday. A strong melodic presence, that’s super-defined, i.e. much of today’s popular music somehow leaves me, as a listener feeling as if I’ve been clobbered over the head. There’s no mystery, there’s no essence, there’s no allusion, its all just right there – BAM!

What is ambient music? What does it mean to make ambient music? Some might not even believe that ambient music is not a music at all. At one point, I tried to define ambient music and posted it on my Ambient Soundbath Podcast site; overall, I think that this definition still fits, but like anything, definitions are rigid and need some tweaking over time. At the very least this definition fits my needs for when I’m talking about ambient music, but I’m starting to get off track.

Looking back at where I started I think about listening to ambient music to open up, to rejuvenate myself, to relax and to just be. I start each morning by listening to Soma.FM’s Drone Zone. It’s a good way for me to get going. My coffee and Drone Zone. It’s nice. It’s calming.

People have written me letters and told me in person all of the different things that they’ve felt listening to my music. I appreciate that. That makes me feel like the the music I’ve created matters. I don’t know if people wake up to my music the way I do with others, but I like knowing that folks are out there in the universe listening to it.

I’m starting to lose the point I was initially trying to capture.

Actually, I’ve fully lost it now. I guess this is probably where I should wrap it up…

Reflecting on David Toop’s Ocean of Sound

 

I don’t have any recollection of how I stumbled upon this. I was doing a series of non-event sonic wallpaper gigs as solo guitarist at local cafes and coffee shops around the Detroit-area and working crummy temp jobs during the day. There was no plan. There were no real goals except to not to have to get a full-time job not doing music. I was kind of in between colleges, but that infers I knew where I was going, but really had no idea where the next educational stop was to be. I had never heard of ambient music, and the closest I had gotten to exploring contemplative music was Pink Floyd and some of my own exploratory jams with my first band.

Around that time, I worked at a bank… I remember this only because it was very boring, and I had to be there all day. Because I only had about a half-hour of cumulative work throughout the day, they let me read on the job, so  I did a lot of reading. One of the books that I ended up reading was David Toop’s Ocean of Sound.

I was reminded of this book recently while doing some random perusing of my favorite Web sites and found a link to a PDF of David Toop’s Ocean of Sound… I didn’t think about it a lot, but I did quickly move to take a look at it, for old time’s sake. As I clicked on the PDF and started to look at a flood of memories came rushing in.

I remember the book as being odd, almost impressionistic. There were contemplative writings and impressions on John Cage, Terry Riley (this was where I discovered In C), and LaMonte Young, Brian Eno, and this was where I read about Satie’s Vexations and his ideas of Furniture Music.

I quickly realized that this book, that had consciously left me with the vaguest of impressions had actually left an indelible mark on all that followed my reading it. Ocean of Sound came to influence, rather subconsciously much of my work and my outlook on the sound, music and experiences that I strive for today.

I haven’t gone back and read it, except for a few brief passages, and parts of it are dated, as it preceded the 2000ish blow up of electronic music in the US, and was published near the peak of dance and rave culture in Europe, but, this book, that’s half treatise and half poetry on the experience of sound, is an overlooked classic.

I’ve dedicated a large swath of my life to thinking about music, sound and the experience of it. It’s curious to me now and worthy of investigation on my part, to  just how much of what I read in David Toop’s Ocean of Sound affected my worldview and my perspective on music. Anything and everything that I think about from the perspective of sound and music is touched on in this book.

Thinking of the experience of sound, I reflect on how sound, noise and acoustic ecology are not things that have caught on here in the United States… these things have caught on elsewhere, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, but not as much here; this is important, because central to what I’ve taken from Ocean of Sound, is that we’re living in an ocean of sound, and the more noise that is injected into our sonic lives the more we turn to our iPods or whatever to tune in to our own sonic environment and tune out the world’s. That’s just fine, but what’s lost is the ability to collectively tune-in to the soundworld around us, collectively, and focus on it, which is at the core of what David Toop writes about, being enveloped by sound and the experience of it.

Sound and music is not to just be heard, it’s to be experienced, whether in a performance hall, or standing under buzzing power lines or enjoying a busker doing a rendition of All Along the Watchtower on a city street; the idea of this came to me as I reflected after reading Ocean of Sound. I became more conscious of sound. I found a vocabulary and a context for things I had experienced and felt while listening to music, and also realized that I could make a music where this kind of music/sound experience wasn’t just serendipity, but was the focal point of the work.

All this is to say, reading Ocean of Sound changed me, and it changed the way I hear and listen. Discovering this book again reminds me of that, and it also reminds me that before I discovered this I was missing a large chunk of what was going on around me.

Thinking of Sound: A finger pointing at the moon

Writing about sound is a real challenge. There’s no possible way that I can use words to explain how a sound and the hearing of it feels. Sure, I can write something that gets you curious to hear it, or I can allude to it, but words are of little value when it comes time to relay the power of sound and music. I’ll keep struggling with it and try to do it, but mostly it will be a lost cause. Sound and music needs to be experienced. Talking about, and using the poetics of words, is like seeing a pencil sketch of the a sunset compared to see the sunset itself.

Words are no good here.

We can only hope that the words trigger some kind of emotional response that opens a person up to this perspective, or brings about a nostalgia to a time when a person was open to what we’re saying. From there, maybe, if we’re lucky, and truly we’ll never know, someone who reads these words may become open to the experience of a sound or a piece of music. The writings, as the Buddhists say, is a finger pointing at the moon, not the moon itself.

Thinking of Sound: Moments connected to moments

Listening to Daniel Lanois’ The Deadly Nightshade from his Belladonna recording, I’m drawn towards thinking about emotion in music. There’s something about music that connects us to the moment. There’s some element that acts as a conduit, connecting us back to a series of events and/or a time that makes us long for that time again. I’ve always been amazed by the transcendental quality of music. In fact, I think that it’s been one of the things that’s brought me back to music time and again. The abstract, almost intangible quality of music and sound gives us a marker for experiences in our lives; almost like a folded-over page, or bookmark indicating that in this time and in this place, this thing
happened. It allows us to live in that time and that sequence of events again, if only for just the few minutes that we are transported back to that place on sonic, and psycho-emotional level. I believe that this connection is one of many conduits to the infinite source, allowing us to connect on conscious level, if only momentarily, to the collective unconscious, and its rich pool of experiences.

« Older posts

© 2026 Matt Borghi

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑